STATE
MEDICAID MANUAL 3257-3259 "Transmittal 64"
GENERAL
AND CATEGORICAL
11-94 ELIGIBILITY
REQUIREMENTS 3257
3257. TRANSFERS
OF ASSETS AND TREATMENT OF TRUSTS
A. General.--Section
13611 of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 (OBRA 1993) amended §1917
of the Act by incorporating in §§1917(c) and (d) new requirements for treatment
of transfers of assets for less than fair market value and for treatment of
trusts. The following instructions
apply only to transfers made and trusts established after the effective date
explained in §3258.2. For transfers
made and trusts established before that effective date, the old policies
regarding treatment of trusts and transfers apply. See §§3215 and 3250 for instructions on the treatment of trusts
established and transfers made before August 11, 1993.
B. Definitions.--The
following definitions apply, as appropriate, to both transfers of assets and
trusts:
1. Individual.--As
used in this instruction, the term
"individual" includes the individual himself or herself, as well as:
o The
individual’s spouse, where the spouse is acting in the place of or on behalf of
the individual;
o A
person, including a court or administrative body, with legal authority to act
in place of or on behalf of the individual or the individual’s spouse; and
o Any
person, including a court or administrative body, acting at the direction or
upon the request of the individual or the individual’s spouse.
2. Spouse.--This
is a person who is considered legally married to an individual under the laws
of the State in which the individual is applying for or receiving Medicaid.
3. Assets.--For
purposes of this section, assets include all income and resources of the
individual and of the individual§s spouse.
This includes income or resources which the individual or the individual§s
spouse is entitled to but does not receive because of any action by:
o The
individual or the individual’s spouse;
o A
person, including a court or administrative body, with legal authority to act
in place of or on behalf of the individual or the individual’s spouse; or
o Any
person, including a court or administrative body, acting at the direction or
upon the request of the individual or the individual’s spouse.
For purposes of this section, the term
"assets an individual or spouse is entitled to" includes assets to
which the individual is entitled or would be entitled if action had not been
taken to avoid receiving the assets.
The following are examples of actions
which would cause income or resources not to be received:
o Irrevocably waiving pension income;
===================================================================
Rev. 64 3-3-109
GENERAL AND CATEGORICAL
3257
(Cont.) ELIGIBILITY
REQUIREMENTS 11-94
o Waiving
the right to receive an inheritance;
o Not
accepting or accessing injury settlements;
o Tort
settlements which are diverted by the defendant into a trust or similar device
to be held for the benefit of an individual who is a plaintiff; and
o Refusal to take legal action to obtain a
court ordered payment that is not being paid, such as child support or alimony.
However, failure to cause assets to be
received does not entail a transfer of assets for less than fair market value
in all instances. For example, the
individual may not be able to afford to take the necessary action to obtain the
assets. Or, the cost of obtaining the
assets may be greater than the assets are worth, thus effectively rendering the
assets worthless to the individual.
Examine the specific circumstances of each case before making a decision
whether an uncompensated asset transfer occurred.
4. Resources.--For
purposes of this section, the definition of resources is the same definition
used by the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program, except that the home is
not excluded for institutionalized individuals. In determining whether a transfer of assets or a trust involves
an SSI-countable resource, use those resource exclusions and disregards used by
the SSI program, except for the exclusion of the home for institutionalized
individuals.
In determining whether resources have
been transferred for less than fair market value, you may not apply more
liberal definitions of resources which you may be using under §1902(r)(2) of
the Act. For transfer of assets purposes, if you are a 209(b) State, you cannot
use more restrictive definitions of resources that you may have in your State
plan.
However, in determining whether and how a
trust is counted in determining eligibility, you may apply more liberal
methodologies for resources which you may be using under §1902(r)(2) of the
Act. For trust purposes, if you are a
209(b) State, you may use more restrictive definitions of resources that you
may have in your State plan.
For noninstitutionalized individuals, the
home remains an exempt resource.
5. Income.--For
purposes of this section, the definition of income is the same definition used
by the SSI program. In determining
whether a transfer of assets involves SSI-countable income, take into account
those income exclusions and disregards used by the SSI program.
You may not, for transfer of assets
purposes, apply more liberal definitions of income that you may be using under §1902(r)(2)
of the Act. If you are a 209(b) State,
you cannot use more restrictive definitions of income that you may have in your
State plan.
However, in determining whether and how a
trust is counted in determining eligibility, you may apply more liberal
methodologies for income which you may be using under §1902(r)(2) of the Act.
Also, for trust purposes, if you are a 209(b) State, you may use more
restrictive definitions of income that you may have in your State plan.
3-3-109.1 Rev.
64
===================================================================
GENERAL AND CATEGORICAL
11-94 ELIGIBILITY
REQUIREMENTS 3258.1
6. For
the Sole Benefit of.--A transfer is considered to be for the sole benefit
of a spouse, blind or disabled child, or a disabled individual if the transfer
is arranged in such a way that no individual or entity except the spouse, blind
or disabled child, or disabled individual can benefit from the assets
transferred in any way, whether at the time of the transfer or at any time in
the future.
Similarly, a trust is considered to be
established for the sole benefit of a spouse, blind or disabled child, or
disabled individual if the trust benefits no one but that individual, whether
at the time the trust is established or
any time in the future. However, the
trust may provide for reasonable compensation, as defined by the State, for a
trustee or trustees to manage the trust, as well as for reasonable costs
associated with investing or otherwise managing the funds or property in the
trust. In defining what is reasonable
compensation, consider the amount of time and effort involved in managing a
trust of the size involved, as well as the prevailing rate of compensation, if
any, for managing a trust of similar size and complexity.
A transfer, transfer instrument,
or trust that provides for funds or property to pass to a beneficiary who is
not the spouse, blind or disabled child, or disabled individual is not
considered to be established for the sole benefit of one of these individuals. In order for a transfer or trust to be
considered to be for the sole benefit of one of these individuals, the
instrument or document must provide for the spending of the funds involved for
the benefit of the individual on a basis that is actuarially sound based on the
life expectancy of the individual involved.
When the instrument or document does not so provide, any potential
exemption from penalty or consideration for eligibility purposes is void.
An exception to this requirement exists
for trusts discussed in §3259.7. Under
these exceptions, the trust instrument must provide that any funds remaining in
the trust upon the death of the individual must go to the State, up to the
amount of Medicaid benefits paid on the individual’s behalf. When these exceptions require that the trust
be for the sole benefit of an individual, the restriction discussed in the
previous paragraph does not apply when the trust instrument designates the
State as the recipient of funds from the trust. Also, the trust may provide for disbursal of funds to other
beneficiaries, provided the trust does not permit such disbursals until the
State’s claim is satisfied. Finally, "pooled" trusts may provide that
the trust can retain a certain percentage of the funds in the trust account
upon the death of the beneficiary.
3258. TRANSFERS
OF ASSETS FOR LESS THAN FAIR MARKET VALUE
3258.1
General.--Under the transfer of assets provisions in §1917(c) of
the Act, as amended by OBRA 1993, you must deny coverage of certain Medicaid
services to otherwise eligible institutionalized individuals who transfer (or whose spouses transfer) assets for
less than fair market value. You may
also choose to deny coverage for certain other services for
noninstitutionalized individuals who transfer (or whose spouses transfer) assets
for less than fair market value. The
following instructions explain the specific circumstances and rules under which
you must deny Medicaid services.
The provisions explained in these
instructions apply to all States, including those using more restrictive
eligibility criteria than are used by the SSI
Rev. 64 3-3-109.2
===================================================================
GENERAL AND CATEGORICAL
3258.1
(Cont.) ELIGIBILITY
REQUIREMENTS 11-94
program, under §1902(f) of the Act. Thus, 209(b) States cannot apply periods of
ineligibility due to a transfer of resources for less than fair market value
except in accordance with these instructions.
A. Definitions.--The
following definitions apply to transfers of assets.
1. Fair
Market Value.--Fair market value is an estimate of the value of an asset,
if sold at the prevailing price at the time it was actually transferred. Value is based on criteria you use in
appraising the value of assets for the purpose of determining Medicaid
eligibility.
NOTE: For an asset to be considered transferred
for fair market value or to be considered to be transferred for valuable
consideration, the compensation received for the asset must be in a tangible
form with intrinsic value. A transfer
for love and consideration, for example, is not considered a transfer for fair
market value. Also, while relatives and
family members legitimately can be paid for care they provide to the
individual, HCFA presumes that services provided for free at the time were
intended to be provided without compensation.
Thus, a transfer to a relative for care provided for free in the past is
a transfer of assets for less than fair market value. However, an individual can rebut this presumption with tangible
evidence that is acceptable to the State.
For example, you may require that a payback arrangement had been agreed
to in writing at the time services were provided.
2. Valuable
Consideration.--Valuable consideration means that an individual receives in
exchange for his or her right or interest in an asset some act, object,
service, or other benefit which has a tangible and/or intrinsic value to the
individual that is roughly equivalent to or greater than the value of the
transferred asset.
3. Uncompensated
Value.--The uncompensated value is the difference between the fair market
value at the time of transfer (less any outstanding loans, mortgages, or other
encumbrances on the asset) and the amount received for the asset.
4. Institutionalized
Individual.--An institutionalized individual is an individual who is:
o An
inpatient in a nursing facility;
o An
inpatient in a medical institution for whom payment is based on a level of care
provided in a nursing facility; or
o A
home and community-based services recipient described in §1902(a)(10)(A)(ii)(VI)
of the Act. For purposes of this section,
a medical institution includes an intermediate care facility for the mentally
retarded (ICF/MR). (See 42 CFR
435.1009.)
5. Noninstitutionalized
Individual.--A noninstitutionalized individual is an individual receiving
any of the services described in §3258.8.
6. Nursing
Facility Services.--Nursing facility services are services as described in
the State Medicaid Plan as nursing facility services.
3-3-109.3 Rev.
64
===================================================================
GENERAL AND CATEGORICAL
11-94 ELIGIBILITY
REQUIREMENTS 3258.4
3258.2 Effective Date.--This section applies to all transfers
which are made on or after August 11, 1993.
Transfers made before August 11, 1993, are treated under the rules in §3250. While this section applies to transfers made
on or after August 11, 1993, penalties for transfers for less than fair market
value, as described in §3258.8, cannot be applied to services provided before
October 1, 1993. Instead, for the
period prior to October 1, 1993, apply pre-OBRA 1993 rules regarding transfers
of assets to transfers made on or after August 11, 1993, and before October 1,
1993.
EXAMPLE: An individual who applies for Medicaid
transfers an asset on September 1, 1993.
The transfer is found to have been made for less than fair market
value. As such, a penalty, as described
in §3258.8, is assessed. Because the
transfer occurred after August 11, 1993, the transfer is assessed under the new
rules set forth in this section. However, because a penalty under OBRA 1993
rules cannot apply before October 1, 1993, the penalty assessed under OBRA 1993
in this case begins on October 1, 1993. Pre-OBRA 1993 rules are used to determine whether a penalty is
assessed for the period between September 1 and October 1. On October 1, begin using the OBRA 1993
rules for the transfer described in this example.
3258.3
Individuals To Whom Transfer of Assets Provisions Apply.--You
must apply these provisions when an institutionalized individual or the individual’s
spouse disposes of assets for less than fair market value on or after the look-back
date explained in §3258.4. You also
have the option of applying this provision to noninstitutionalized individuals
when those individuals or their spouses dispose of assets for less than fair
market value.
See §3258 for definitions of institutionalized
and noninstitutionalized individuals.
For purposes of this section, assets
transferred by a parent, guardian, court or administrative body, or anyone
acting in place of or on behalf of or at the request or direction of the
individual or spouse, are considered to be transferred by the individual or
spouse.
For noninstitutionalized individuals, you
have the option of applying these provisions.
If you wish to apply these provisions to noninstitutionalized
individuals, you have the further option of choosing the groups to which the
provisions apply. You may apply them to
all noninstitutionalized individuals, or to specific categorical groups. However, if you choose to apply these
provisions only to some groups, the groups you choose must be recognized groups
as listed in §1905(a) of the Act.
3258.4 Look-Back
Date and Look-Back Period.--The look-back date is the earliest date
on which a penalty for transferring assets for less than fair market value can
be assessed. Penalties can be assessed
for transfers which take place on or after the look-back date. Penalties cannot be assessed for transfers
which take place prior to the look-back date.
The look-back date varies for individuals transferring assets, depending
on whether they are institutionalized, and there are special rules for some
trusts, as described in subsection E.
Rev. 64 3-3-109.4
===================================================================
GENERAL AND CATEGORICAL
3258.4
(Cont.) ELIGIBILITY
REQUIREMENTS 11-94
A. Institutionalized
Individual.-- For an individual in an institution, the look-back date is 36
months prior to the baseline date. The
baseline date is the first date as of which the individual was:
o Institutionalized; and
o Applied for medical assistance under the
State plan.
When an individual is already a Medicaid
recipient and becomes institutionalized, the baseline date is the date upon
which both of the above conditions are met, that is, the first day of
institutionalization.
B. Noninstitutionalized
Individual.--For a noninstitutionalized individual, the look-back date is
36 months prior to the baseline date, which is the date the individual:
o Applies for medical assistance under the
State plan; or, if later,
o The date on which the individual disposes
of assets for less than fair market value.
C.
Multiple Periods of Institutionalization and Multiple Applications.--When
an individual has multiple periods of institutionalization or has made multiple
applications for Medicaid (whether or not they are successful), the look-back
date is based on a baseline date that is the first date upon which the
individual has both applied for Medicaid and is institutionalized. Similarly, if a noninstitutionalized
individual has applied for Medicaid more than once and has made more than one
transfer of assets, the baseline date is that date on which the individual has
first applied for Medicaid or, if later, made the first transfer of assets for
less than fair market value after applying. Thus, each individual has only one
look-back date, regardless of the number of periods of institutionalization,
applications for Medicaid, periods of eligibility, or transfers of assets.
D.
Look-Back Period.--The look-back period is the period that
begins with the look-back date and ends with the baseline date. This can be 36 or 60 months, depending on
whether certain kinds of trusts are involved.
(See subsection E for look-back periods involving trusts.) The look-back period is the period of time
prior to the baseline date during which a previous transfer of assets for less
than fair market value can be penalized.
However, it is important to note that transfers which occur after the
baseline date are also subject to penalty if they are made for less than fair
market value.
NOTE: The 36 month look-back periods described
above do not become fully effective until August 11, 1996. Prior to that date, a 36 month look-back
period actually begins at some time before the date transfers are covered by
these rules. While the 36 month
look-back period is effective for transfers made on or after August 11, 1993,
any transfers actually made before that date are treated under the rules described
in §3250. Thus, the look-back period is
phased in over the 36-month period ending August 11, 1996.
3-3-109.5 Rev.
64
===================================================================
GENERAL
AND CATEGORICAL
11-94 ELIGIBILITY
REQUIREMENTS 3258.4
(Cont.)
EXAMPLE 1: Institutionalized Individual
An individual is institutionalized on
February 13, 1997. He/she applies for
Medicaid on April 7, 1997. The
look-back date is the date 36 months prior to the baseline date, when both
initiating requirements are met, i.e., institutionalization and
application for Medicaid. That date is
April 7, 1997. Thus, the look-back date
is April 7, 1994. The look-back period
is from April 7, 1994, through April 7, 1997.
EXAMPLE
2: Institutionalized Individual
An individual is institutionalized on
February 13, 1995. He/she applies for
Medicaid on April 7, 1995. The
look-back date is 36 months prior to April 7, 1995, or April 7, 1992. However, because the transfer provisions of
OBRA 1993 apply only to transfers made on or after August 11, 1993, any
transfers made prior to August 11, 1993, are treated under the rules in §3250.
EXAMPLE 3: Noninstitutionalized
Individual
An individual applies for Medicaid on
February 13, 1997. On April 7, 1997,
he/she transfers an asset for less than fair market value. The look-back date in this case is April 7,
1994, 36 months prior to the baseline date on which he/she transferred the
asset. If the asset had been
transferred before February 13, 1997 (the date of application for Medicaid),
the baseline date would have been February 13, 1997 (the date of
application). The look-back period
would begin February 13, 1994, and extend to February 13, 1997.
E. Look-Back
Period for Transfers of Assets Involving Trusts.--When an individual
establishes a revocable trust a portion of which is disbursed to someone other
than the grantor or for the benefit of the grantor, that portion is treated as
a transfer of assets for less than fair market value. When an individual
establishes an irrevocable trust in which all or a portion of the trust cannot
be disbursed to or on behalf of the individual, that portion is treated as a
transfer of assets for less than fair market value. When a portion of a trust is treated as a transfer, the look-back
period discussed in subsection D is extended to 60 months from:
o The
date the individual applied for Medicaid and was institutionalized; or,
o For
a noninstitutionalized individual, the date the individual applied for Medicaid
or, if later, the date the transfer was made.
When a trust is irrevocable but some or
all of the trust can be disbursed to or for the benefit of the individual, the
look-back period applying to disbursements which could be made to or for the
individual but are made to another person or persons is 36 months.
When the trust is revocable, the transfer
is considered to take place on the date upon which the payment to someone other
than the grantor was made. If the trust
is irrevocable, the transfer is considered to have been made as of the date the
trust was established or, if later, the date upon which payment to the grantor
was foreclosed.
Rev. 64 3-3-109.6
===================================================================
GENERAL AND CATEGORICAL
3258.5 ELIGIBILITY
REQUIREMENTS 11-94
When an individual places assets
into an irrevocable trust and can still benefit from those assets, the amount
transferred is any of those assets which have been paid out for a purpose other
than to or for the benefit of the individual.
When an individual places assets in an irrevocable trust and can no
longer benefit from some or all of those assets, that unavailable portion of
the trust is considered as transferred for less than fair market value. The value of these assets is not reduced by
any payments from the trust which may be made from these unavailable assets at
a later date.
See §§3259ff. for a discussion of
treatment of trusts in determining eligibility for Medicaid.
See §3259.6 for rules which apply when
assets which may involve a transfer of assets for less than fair market value
are placed in a trust.
3258.5 Penalty
Periods.--When an individual (or spouse) makes a transfer of assets for
less than fair market value, payment for certain services received by the
individual is denied for a specified period of time. However, the individual remains eligible for Medicaid and can
have payment made for services not subject to penalty. (See §3258.8.) For example, an institutionalized individual
who transfers assets for less than fair market value must be denied reimbursement
for nursing facility services. However,
he or she may still be eligible for reimbursement for physician’s services,
provided such services are not provided as part of the individual’s nursing
home care.
A. Penalty
Date.--The penalty date is the beginning date of each penalty period that
is imposed for an uncompensated transfer.
The penalty date for all individuals who transfer assets for less than
fair market value is the first day of the month in which the asset was
transferred (or, at State option, the first day of the month following the
month of transfer), provided that date does not occur during an existing
penalty period. If an asset was
transferred prior to the look-back date discussed in §3258.4, no penalty can be
imposed for that transfer.
B. Penalty
Period - General.--The penalty period is the period of time during which
payment for specified services is denied.
Unlike the penalty period under the rules discussed in §3250, which was
limited to 30 months, the penalty period under the OBRA 1993 rules has no
statutory limit. Rather, the length of
the penalty period is based solely on the value of the assets transferred and
the cost of nursing facility care.
C. Transfer
of Assets Takes Place During Existing Penalty Period.--When a transfer for
less than fair market value takes place during an existing penalty period,
whether imposed under the pre-OBRA 1993 or post-OBRA 1993 rules, a new penalty
period cannot begin until the existing penalty period has expired.
EXAMPLE: An individual transferred an asset in May
1993 for which a penalty of 12 months was imposed. The individual transfers another asset in October 1993 to which
another 12 month penalty applies. Because
the second transfer took place within the first 12 month penalty period, the
second penalty period cannot begin until the first expires, on April 30,
1994. Thus, the first penalty period
runs from May 1, 1993, through April 30, 1994, and the second runs from May 1,
1994, through April 30, 1995.
3-3-109.7 Rev.
64
===================================================================
GENERAL AND CATEGORICAL
11-94 ELIGIBILITY
REQUIREMENTS 3258.5
(Cont.)
D. Restricted
Coverage - Institutionalized Individual.--The penalty for an institutionalized individual consists
of ineligibility for certain services for a period or periods of ineligibility
that equal the number of months calculated by taking the total, cumulative
uncompensated value of all assets transferred by the individual or spouse on or
after the look-back date discussed in §3258.4, divided by the average monthly
cost to a private patient of nursing facility services in the State at the time
of application. As an alternative, the
State may use the average monthly cost in the community in which the individual
is institutionalized.
When the amount of the transfer is less
than the monthly cost of nursing facility care, you have the option of not imposing a penalty or imposing a
penalty for less than a full month.
Under the latter option, the actual length of the penalty is based on
the proportion of the State§s private nursing facility rate that was
transferred. If you choose to impose
penalties for less than a full month, you must impose such penalties in all
cases where a partial month penalty applies.
When an individual makes a series of
transfers, each of which is less than the private nursing facility rate for a
month, you have the option of imposing no penalty or imposing a series of
penalties, each for less than a full month.
E. Restricted
Coverage - Noninstitutionalized Individual.--The penalty period for a
noninstitutionalized individual is calculated using the same method that is
used for an institutionalized individual, including use of the average monthly
cost of nursing facility services. The penalty for a noninstitutionalized
individual cannot exceed the number of months calculated using this
method. However, you may impose shorter
penalty periods if you wish to do so.
Obtain HCFA approval for any shorter penalty period you choose to impose,
including approval of the methodology you use to calculate the shorter penalty
period. See subsection D for transfers
which are less than the private monthly rate for nursing facility care.
F. Individual
Has Penalty Period Both As Institutionalized And Noninstitutionalized
Individual.--When an individual incurs separate penalty periods as both
institutionalized and noninstitutionalized for the same transfer, the total
penalty period cannot exceed the penalty period that is applicable under only
one category. In other words, a penalty
imposed during a period of institutionalization reduces a penalty imposed for
the same transfer or transfers made during the period of
noninstitutionalization and vice versa.
EXAMPLE: An institutionalized individual transfers
assets for less than fair market value, thereby incurring a transfer penalty of
24 months. After 12 months have
elapsed, the individual leaves the institution and returns home. Because the State imposes penalties on
noninstitutionalized individuals for transfers for less than fair market value,
the same 24 month penalty applies to the individual, even though he/she left
the institution. However, because of
the limits on total penalty described above, the individual incurs only the 12
month penalty remaining from the transfer which occurred while he/she was
institutionalized.
Rev. 64 3-3-109.8
===================================================================
GENERAL AND CATEGORICAL
3258.5
(Cont.) ELIGIBILITY
REQUIREMENTS 11-94
G. Multiple
Transfers - General.--OBRA 1993 provides that the number of months of
restricted coverage discussed in subsections C and D is based on the total,
cumulative uncompensated value of the assets transferred. When a single asset is transferred or a
number of assets are transferred during the same month, the penalty period is
calculated using the total value of the asset(s) divided by the average monthly
cost of nursing facility care. When
assets are transferred at different times, use the following methods for
calculating the penalty periods.
H. Transfers
Made So That Penalty Periods Overlap.--When assets have been transferred in
amounts and/or frequency that make the calculated penalty periods overlap, add
together the value of all assets transferred, and divide by the cost of nursing
facility care. This produces a single
penalty period which begins on the first day of the month in which the first
transfer was made.
EXAMPLE: An individual transfers $10,000 in January,
$10,000 in February, and $10,000 in March, all of which are uncompensated. Calculated individually, based on a nursing
facility cost of $2,500 a month, the penalty for the first transfer is from
January through April, the second is from February through May, and the third
is from March through June. Because
these periods overlap, calculate the penalty period by adding the transfers
together (a total of $30,000) and dividing by the nursing home cost
($2,500). This yields a penalty period
of 12 months, which runs from January 1 through December 31 of that year.
As an alternative, calculate the
individual penalty periods, as above, and impose them sequentially. Thus, the
penalty for the first transfer extends from January through April, the second
extends from May through August, and the third extends from September through
December. In this example, the result
is the same regardless of the method used.
I. Transfers
Made So That Penalty Periods Do Not Overlap.--When multiple transfers are
made in such a way that the penalty periods for each do not overlap, treat each
transfer as a separate event with its own penalty period.
EXAMPLE: An individual transfers $5,000 in January,
$5,000 in May, and $5,000 in October, all of which are uncompensated. Assuming a State private nursing facility
cost of $2,500 a month, the penalty periods for transfers are, respectively,
January through February, May through June, and October through November.
If you wish to use other methodologies
for determining penalty periods, you may do so, provided you obtain HCFA
approval for those methods. However,
any alternative method must adhere to the basic principles that:
o The
total, cumulative uncompensated value of the asset or assets transferred is
used to determine the length of the penalty period or periods;
o Penalty
periods do not overlap, nor in any way run concurrently; and
o No
penalty period can begin while a previous penalty period is in effect.
3-3-109.9 Rev.
64
===================================================================
GENERAL AND CATEGORICAL
11-94 ELIGIBILITY
REQUIREMENTS 3258.6
J. Transfer
By a Spouse That Results in Penalty Period for the Individual.--When a
spouse transfers an asset that results in a penalty for the individual, the
penalty period must, in certain instances, be apportioned between the
spouses. You must apportion the penalty
when:
o The
spouse is eligible for Medicaid;
o A
penalty could, under normal circumstances, be assessed against the spouse,
i.e., the spouse is institutionalized, or the State has elected to impose
penalties on noninstitutionalized individuals; and
o Some
portion of the penalty against the individual remains at the time the above
conditions are met.
When these conditions are met, you must
apportion any existing penalty period between the spouses. You may use any
reasonable methodology you wish to determine how the penalty is apportioned.
However, the methodology you use must provide that the total penalty imposed on
both spouses does not exceed the length of the penalty originally imposed on
the individual.
EXAMPLE: Mr. Able enters a nursing facility and
applies for Medicaid. Mrs. Able
transfers an asset that results in a 36 month penalty against Mr. Able. Twelve months into the penalty period, Mrs.
Able enters a nursing facility and becomes eligible for Medicaid. The penalty
period against Mr. Able still has 24 months to run. Because Mrs. Able is now in a nursing facility, and a portion of
the original penalty period remains, you must apportion the remaining 24 months
of penalty between Mr. and Mrs. Able.
You may apportion the remaining penalty period in any way you wish,
provided that the total remaining penalty period assessed against both spouses
does not exceed 24 months.
When, for some reason, one spouse is no
longer subject to a penalty (e.g., the spouse no longer receives nursing
facility services, or the spouse dies), the remaining penalty period applicable
to both spouses must be served by the remaining spouse.
In the above example, assume the 24 month
penalty period was apportioned equally between Mr. and Mrs. Able. After six months, Mr. Able leaves the
nursing facility, but Mrs. Able remains.
Because Mr. Able is no longer subject to the penalty, the remaining
total penalty (12 months) must be imposed on Mrs. Able. If Mr. Able returns to the nursing facility
before the end of the 12 month period, the remaining penalty is again
apportioned between the two spouses.
K. Penalty
Period When Individual Leaves Institution.--A penalty period imposed for a
transfer of assets runs continuously from the first date of the penalty period
(the penalty date), regardless of whether the individual remains in or leaves
the institution (or waiver program).
Thus, if the individual leaves the nursing facility, the penalty period nevertheless continues
until the end of the calculated period.
3258.6
Treatment Of Income As Asset.--Under OBRA 1993, income, in
addition to resources, is considered to be an asset for transfer (and trust)
purposes. Thus, when an individual§s
income is given or assigned in some manner to another person, such a gift or
assignment can be considered a transfer of assets for less than fair market
value.
Rev. 64 3-3-109.10
===================================================================
GENERAL AND CATEGORICAL
3258.6
(Cont.) ELIGIBILITY
REQUIREMENTS 11-94
In determining whether income has been
transferred, do not attempt to ascertain in detail the individual’s spending
habits during the 36 or 60 month look-back period. Absent some reason to believe otherwise, assume that ordinary household
income was legitimately spent on the normal costs of daily living.
However, you should attempt to determine
whether the individual has transferred lump sum payments actually received in a
month. Such payments, while counted as
income in the month received for eligibility purposes, are counted as resources
in the following month if they were retained.
Disposal of such lump sum payments before they can be counted as
resources could constitute an uncompensated transfer of assets. Also attempt to determine whether amounts of
regularly scheduled income or lump sum payments, which the individual would
otherwise have received, have been transferred. Normally, such a transfer takes the form of a transfer of the right
to receive income. For example, a private
pension may be diverted to a trust and no longer be paid to the
individual. You may raise questions on
whether lump sums of income or the right to income have been transferred based
on information given on the Medicaid application or through active questioning
of the individual concerning sources of income, income levels in the past
versus the present, direct questions about giving income to others, etc.
When you find that income or the right to
income has been transferred, a penalty for that transfer must be imposed
for institutionalized individuals (if no exceptions apply). In determining the length of the penalty
period, you may use several methods of treating the income involved.
When a single lump sum is transferred
(e.g., a stock dividend check is given to another person in the month in which
it is received by the individual), the penalty period is calculated on the
basis of the value of the lump sum payment.
When the amount of the payment is small enough that a full month’s
penalty does not result, you have the option of not imposing a penalty or, if
you choose, applying the penalty for only part of the month.
EXAMPLE: A lump sum amount of $1,000 is transferred,
but the State’s private nursing facility rate is $2,000. You can either impose no penalty or apply a
penalty for half of the month.
When a stream of income, (i.e., income
received in a regular basis, such as a pension) or the right to a stream of
income is transferred, you can calculate the penalty period as you would for a
single lump sum. Using this method, a
penalty period is imposed for each income payment. When the transfer involves a right to income (as opposed to
periodic transfers of income the individual owns) you can, as an alternative, make
a determination of the total amount of income expected to be transferred during
the individual’s life, based on an actuarial projection of the individual’s
life expectancy, and calculate the penalty on the basis of the projected total
income.
You may choose to use alternative methods
for determining the length of the penalty period where income is transferred.
However, you must obtain approval from HCFA for use of alternative methods.
3258.7 Treatment
Of Jointly Owned Assets.--When an asset is held by an individual in common
with another person or persons via joint tenancy, tenancy in common, joint
ownership, or a similar arrangement, the asset (or affected portion of the
asset) is considered to be transferred by the individual when any action is
taken, either by the individual or any other person, that reduces or eliminates
the individual’s ownership or control of the asset.
3-3-109.11 Rev.
64
===================================================================
GENERAL AND CATEGORICAL
11-94 ELIGIBILITY
REQUIREMENTS 3258.8
Under this provision, merely placing
another person’s name on an account or asset as a joint owner might not
constitute a transfer of assets subject, of course, to the specific
circumstances of the situation. In such
a situation, the individual may still possess ownership rights to the account
or asset and thus have the right to withdraw all of the funds in the account or
possess the asset at any time. Thus, the account or asset is still considered
to belong to the individual. However,
actual withdrawal of funds from the account or removal of the asset by the
other person removes the funds or property from the control of the individual
and so constitutes a transfer of assets.
Also, if placing another person’s name on the account or asset actually
limits the individual’s right to sell or otherwise dispose of the asset (e.g., the
addition of another person’s name requires that the person agree to the sale or
disposal of the asset where no such agreement was necessary before), such
placement constitutes a transfer of assets.
Use regular Medicaid rules to determine
what portion of a jointly held asset is presumed to belong to an applicant or
recipient. This portion is subject to a
transfer penalty if it is withdrawn by a joint owner. However, you must also provide an opportunity for the owners to
rebut the presumption of ownership. If
either the applicant/recipient or the other person can establish to your
satisfaction that the funds withdrawn were, in fact, the sole property of and
contributed to the account by the other person, and thus did not belong to the
applicant/recipient, withdrawal of those funds should not result in the
imposition of a penalty.
3258.8
Penalties for Transfers of Assets for Less Than Fair Market Value.--When
you find that assets have been transferred for less than fair market value,
OBRA 1993 provides for specific penalties.
These penalties involve the denial of reimbursement for certain services
received by the individual. The
specific services for which reimbursement must be withheld depend on the individual’s
situation.
A. Penalties
For Institutionalized Individuals.--For institutionalized individuals, the
services for which payment must be withheld are:
o Nursing
facility services, as defined in the State Medicaid Plan;
o A
level of care in any institution equivalent to that of nursing facility
services; and
o Home
and community-based services provided under a waiver for individuals eligible
for such services under §1915(c) or (d) of the Act.
B. Penalties
for Noninstitutionalized Individuals.--For a noninstitutionalized
individual, the services for which payment must be withheld are the following,
not including those services described above:
o Home health services, as described in §1905(a)(7)
of the Act;
o Home and community care (to the extent
allowed and as defined in §1929 of the Act) for functionally disabled elderly
adults (see §1905(a)(22) of the Act); and
o Personal care services furnished to
individuals who are not inpatients in certain medical institutions. (See §1905(a)(24) of the Act.)
Rev. 64 3-3-109.12
===================================================================
GENERAL AND CATEGORICAL
3258.9 ELIGIBILITY
REQUIREMENTS 11-94
At the option of the State, you may also
withhold reimbursement for services provided to noninstitutionalized
individuals for other long term care services for which medical assistance is
otherwise available under the State plan to individuals requiring long term
care. Such services might include, for
example, private duty nursing. However,
the specific services involved depend on your own State plan.
3258.9 Treatment
of Certain Kinds of Transfers for Less Than Fair Market Value.--Certain
financial transactions or purchases may constitute a transfer of assets for
less than fair market value. Treat the following as described.
A. Life
Estates.--Under a life estate, an individual who owns property transfers ownership
of that property to another individual while retaining, for the rest of his or
her life (or the life of another person), certain rights to that property. Generally, a life estate entitles the owner
of the life estate (the grantor) to possess, use, and obtain profits from the
property as long as he or she lives.
However, actual ownership of the property has passed to another
individual.
In a transaction involving a life estate,
a transfer of assets is involved. This
transfer is for less than fair market value whenever the value of the
transferred asset is greater than the value of the rights conferred by the life
estate.
In determining whether a penalty is
assessed because of a life estate and how long that penalty should be, compute
the value of the asset transferred and the value of the life estate, and
calculate the difference between the two.
The value of the asset transferred is
computed by using the regular Medicaid
rules for determining the value of assets.
To calculate the value of the life estate, use the life estate table
below (from POMS SI 01140.120).
Determine the value of the life estate by multiplying the current market
value of the property by the life estate factor that corresponds to the grantor’s
age. The value of the life estate is
then subtracted from the value of the asset transferred to determine the
portion of the asset that was transferred for less than fair market value. Or, if only the value of the transferred
portion is needed, multiply the current market value of the asset by the
remainder factor.
EXAMPLE: Mrs. Able, age 65, owns a house with a
small farm attached to it, worth $100,000 in total. She deeds the house and farm to her son but retains a life estate
in the property. Under the terms of the life estate, Mrs. Able is entitled to
live in the house for the rest of her life and to any produce, income, etc.
generated by the farm. To determine the
value of Mrs. Able’s life estate, the current market value of the property
($100,000) is multiplied by a life estate factor corresponding to Mrs. Able§s
age in the table (.67970), resulting in a life estate worth $67,970. The penalty is assessed for the difference
between the value of the asset transferred ($100,000) and the value of the life
estate ($67,790), or a penalty based on $32,030 of assets transferred for less
than fair market value.
Some States allow life estates with
powers, wherein the owner of the property creates a life estate for himself or
herself, retaining the power to sell the property, with a remainder interest to
someone else, e.g., a child. Since the
life estate holder retains the power to sell the property, its value as a
3-3-109.13 Rev.
64
===================================================================
GENERAL AND CATEGORICAL
11-94 ELIGIBILITY
REQUIREMENTS 3258.9
(Cont.)
resource is its full equity value. In this situation, the individual has not
transferred anything of value, because he or she can terminate the life estate
at any time and restore full ownership to himself or herself. Instead, the full value of the asset in
question is treated as a countable resource to the individual (assuming, of
course, that it is not an otherwise excluded resource).
LIFE ESTATE AND REMAINDER INTEREST TABLE
(See 26 CFR 20.2031-7 and 49 FR Vol. 49
No. 93/5-11-84.)
AGE LIFE ESTATE REMAINDER AGE LIFE
ESTATE REMAINDER
0 .97188 .02812 35 .93868 .06132
1 .98988 .01012 36 .93460 .06540
2 .99017 .00983 37 .93026 .06974
3 .99008 .00992 38 .92567 .07433
4 .98981 .01019 39 .92083 .07917
5 .98938 .01062 40 .91571 .08429
6 .98884 .01116 41 .91030 .08970
7 .98822 .01178 42 .90457 .09543
8 .98748 .01252 43 .89855 .10145
9 .98663 .01337 44 .89221 .10779
10 .98565 .01435 45 .88558 .11442
11 .98453 .01547 46 .87863 .12137
12 .98329 .01671 47 .87137 .12863
13 .98198 .01802 48 .86374 .13626
14 .98066 .01934 49 .85578 .14422
15 .97937 .02063 50 .84743 .15257
16 .97815 .02185 51 .83674 .16126
17 .97700 .02300 52 .82969 .17031
18 .97590 .02410 53 .82028 .17972
19 .97480 .02520 54 .81054 .18946
20 .97365 .02635 55 .80046 .19954
21 .97245 .02755 56 .79006 .20994
22 .97120 .02880 57 .77931 .22069
23 .96986 .03014 58 .76822 .23178
24 .96841 .03159 59 .75675 .24325
25 .96678 .03322 60 .74491 .25509
26 .96495 .03505 61 .73267 .26733
27 .96290 .03710 62 .72002 .27998
28 .96062 .03938 63 .70696 .29304
29 .95813 .04187 64 .69352 .30648
30 .95543 .04457 65 .67970 .32030
31 .95254 .04746 66 .66551 .33449
32 .94942 .05058 67 .65098 .34902
33 .94608 .05392 68 .63610 .36390
34 .94250 .05750 69 .62086 .37914
Rev. 64 3-3-109.14
===================================================================
GENERAL AND CATEGORICAL
3258.9
(Cont.) ELIGIBILITY
REQUIREMENTS 11-94
LIFE ESTATE AND REMAINDER INTEREST TABLE
(Cont.)
AGE LIFE ESTATE REMAINDER AGE LIFE
ESTATE REMAINDER
70 .60522 .39478 90 .28221 .71779
71 .58914 .41086 91 .26955 .73045
72 .57261 .42739 92 .25771 .74229
73 .55571 .44429 93 .24692 .75308
74 .53862 .46138 94 .23728 .76272
75 .52149 .47851 95 .22887 .77113
76 .50441 .49559 96 .22181 .77819
77 .48742 .51258 97 .21550 .78450
78 .47049 .52951 98 .21000 .79000
79 .45357 .54643 99 .20486 .79514
80 .43659 .56341 100 .19975 .80025
81 .41967 .58033 101 .19532 .80468
82 .40295 .59705 102 .19054 .80946
83 .38642 .61358 103 .18437 .81563
84 .36998 .63002 104 .17856 .82144
85 .35359 .64641 105 .16962 .83038
86 .33764 .66236 106 .15488 .84512
87 .32262 .67738 107 .13409 .86591
88 .30859 .69141 108 .10068 .89932
89 .29526 .70474 109 .04545 .95455
B. Annuities.--Section
1917(d)(6) of the Act provides that the term "trust" includes an
annuity to the extent and in such manner as the Secretary specifies. This subsection describes how annuities are
treated under the trust/transfer provisions.
When an individual purchases an annuity,
he or she generally pays to the entity issuing the annuity (e.g., a bank or
insurance company) a lump sum of money, in return for which he or she is
promised regular payments of income in certain amounts. These payments may continue for a fixed
period of time (for example, 10 years) or for as long as the individual (or
another designated beneficiary) lives, thus creating an ongoing income stream. The annuity may or may not include a
remainder clause under which, if the annuitant dies, the contracting entity
converts whatever is remaining in the annuity into a lump sum and pays it to a
designated beneficiary.
Annuities, although usually purchased in
order to provide a source of income for retirement, are occasionally used to
shelter assets so that individuals purchasing them can become eligible for
Medicaid. In order to avoid penalizing
annuities validly purchased as part of a retirement plan but to capture those
annuities which abusively shelter assets, a determination must be made with
regard to the ultimate purpose of the annuity (i.e., whether the purchase of
the annuity constitutes a transfer of assets for less than fair market
value). If the expected return on the
annuity is commensurate with a reasonable estimate of the life expectancy of
the beneficiary, the annuity can be deemed actuarially sound.
3-3-109.15 Rev.
64
===================================================================
GENERAL AND CATEGORICAL
11-94 ELIGIBILITY
REQUIREMENTS 3258.9
(Cont.)
To make this determination, use the
following life expectancy tables, compiled from information published by the
Office of the Actuary of the Social Security Administration. The average number of years of expected life
remaining for the individual must coincide with the life of the annuity. If the individual is not reasonably expected
to live longer than the guarantee period of the annuity, the individual will
not receive fair market value for the annuity based on the projected
return. In this case, the annuity is
not actuarially sound and a transfer of assets for less than fair market value
has taken place, subjecting the individual to a penalty. The penalty is assessed based on a transfer
of assets for less than fair market value that is considered to have occurred
at the time the annuity was purchased.
For example, if a male at age 65
purchases a $10,000 annuity to be paid over the course of 10 years, his life
expectancy according to the table is 14.96 years. Thus, the annuity is actuarially sound. However, if a male at age 80 purchases the same annuity for
$10,000 to be paid over the course of 10 years, his life expectancy is only
6.98 years. Thus, a payout of the
annuity for approximately 3 years is considered a transfer of assets for less
than fair market value and that amount is subject to penalty.
Rev. 64 3-3-109.16
===================================================================
GENERAL AND CATEGORICAL
3258.9
(Cont.) ELIGIBILITY
REQUIREMENTS 11-94
LIFE EXPECTANCY TABLE - MALES
Life Life Life
Age Expectancy Age Expectancy Age Expectancy
0 71.80 40 35.05 80 6.98
1 71.53 41 34.15 81 6.59
2 70.58 42 33.26 82 6.21
3 69.62 43 32.37 83 5.85
4 68.65 44 31.49 84 5.51
5 67.67 45 30.61 85 5.19
6 66.69 46 29.74 86 4.89
7 65.71 47 28.88 87 4.61
8 64.73 48 28.02 88 4.34
9 63.74 49 27.17 89 4.09
10 62.75 50 26.32 90 3.86
11 61.76 51 25.48 91 3.64
12 60.78 52 24.65 92 3.43
13 59.79 53 23.82 93 3.24
14 58.82 54 23.01 94 3.06
15 57.85 55 22.21 95 2.90
16 56.91 56 21.43 96 2.74
17 55.97 57 20.66 97 2.60
18 55.05 58 19.90 98 2.47
19 54.13 59 19.15 99 2.34
20 53.21 60 18.42 100 2.22
21 52.29 61 17.70 101 2.11
22 51.38 62 16.99 102 1.99
23 50.46 63 16.30 103 1.89
24 49.55 64 15.62 104 1.78
25 48.63 65 14.96 105 1.68
26 47.72 66 14.32 106 1.59
27 46.80 67 13.70 107 1.50
28 45.88 68 13.09 108 1.41
29 44.97 69 12.50 109 1.33
30 44.06 70 11.92 110 1.25
31 43.15 71 11.35 111 1.17
32 42.24 72 10.80 112 1.10
33 41.33 73 10.27 113 1.02
34 40.23 74 9.27 114 0.96
35 39.52 75 9.24 115 0.89
36 38.62 76 8.76 116 0.83
37 37.73 77 8.29 117 0.77
38 36.83 78 7.83 118 0.71
39 35.94 79 7.40 119 0.66
3-3-109.17 Rev.
64
===================================================================
GENERAL AND CATEGORICAL
11-94 ELIGIBILITY
REQUIREMENTS 3258.9
(Cont.)
LIFE EXPECTANCY TABLE - FEMALES
Life Life Life
Age Expectancy Age Expectancy
Age Expectancy
0 78.79 40 40.61 80 9.11
1 78.42 41 39.66 81 8.58
2 77.48 42 38.72 82 8.06
3 76.51 43 37.78 83 7.56
4 75.54 44 36.85 84 7.08
5 74.56 45 35.92 85 6.63
6 73.57 46 35.00 86 6.20
7 72.59 47 34.08 87 5.79
8 71.60 48 33.17 88 5.41
9 70.61 49 32.27 89 5.05
10 69.62 50 31.37 90 4.71
11 68.63 51 30.48 91 4.40
12 67.64 52 29.60 92 4.11
13 66.65 53 28.72 93 3.84
14 65.67 54 27.86 94 3.59
15 64.68 55 27.00 95 3.36
16 63.71 56 26.15 96 3.16
17 62.74 57 25.31 97 2.97
18 61.77 58 24.48 98 2.80
19 60.80 59 23.67 99 2.64
20 59.83 60 22.86 100 2.48
21 58.86 61 22.06 101 2.34
22 57.89 62 21.27 102 2.20
23 56.92 63 20.49 103 2.06
24 55.95 64 19.72 104 1.93
25 54.98 65 18.96 105 1.81
26 54.02 66 18.21 106 1.69
27 53.05 67 17.48 107 1.58
28 52.08 68 16.76 108 1.48
29 51.12 69 16.04 109 1.38
30 50.15 70 15.35 110 1.28
31 49.19 71 14.66 111 1.19
32 48.23 72 13.99 112 1.10
33 47.27 73 13.33 113 1.02
34 46.31 74 12.68 114 0.96
35 45.35 75 12.05 115 0.89
36 44.40 76 11.43 116 0.83
37 43.45 77 10.83 117 0.77
38 42.50 78 10.24 118 0.71
39 41.55 79 9.67 119 0.66
Rev. 64 3-3-109.18
===================================================================
GENERAL AND CATEGORICAL
3258.10 ELIGIBILITY
REQUIREMENTS 11-94
3258.10
Exceptions to Application of Transfer of Assets Penalties.--There
are a number of instances where, even if an asset is transferred for less than
fair market value, the penalties discussed above do not apply. These exceptions are:
A. The
asset transferred is the individual§s home, and title to the home is
transferred to:
o The
spouse of the individual;
o A
child of the individual who is under age 21;
o A
child who is blind or permanently and totally disabled as defined by a State
program established under title XVI in States eligible to participate in such
programs or blind or disabled as defined by the SSI program in all other
States;
o The
sibling of the individual who has an equity interest in the home and who has
been residing in the home for a period of at least one year immediately before
the date the individual becomes institutionalized; or
o A son or daughter of the individual
(other than a child as described above) who was residing in the home for at
least two years immediately before the date the individual becomes
institutionalized, and who (as determined by the State) provided care to the
individual which permitted the individual to reside at home, rather than in an
institution or facility.
B. The
assets were:
o Transferred
to the individual§s spouse or to another for the sole benefit of the individual’s
spouse;
o Transferred
from the individual§s spouse to another for the sole benefit of the individual’s
spouse;
o Transferred
to the individual§s child, or to a trust (including a trust described in §3259.7)
established solely for the benefit of the individual’s child (The child must be blind or permanently and
totally disabled, as defined by a State program established under title XVI, in
States eligible to participate in such programs or blind or disabled as defined
under SSI in all other States); or
o Transferred
to a trust (including a trust as discussed in ‘3259.7) established for the sole
benefit of an individual under 65 years of age who is disabled as defined under
SSI.
1. For
the Sole Benefit of.--See §3257 for a definition of the term "for the
sole benefit of."
In determining whether an asset was
transferred for the sole benefit of a spouse, child, or disabled individual,
ensure that the transfer was accomplished via a written instrument of transfer
(e.g., a trust document) which legally binds the parties to a specified course
of action and which clearly sets out the conditions under which the transfer
was made, as well as who can benefit from the transfer. A transfer without such a document cannot be
said to have been made for the sole benefit of the spouse, child, or disabled
individual, since there is no way to establish, without a document, that only
the specified individuals will benefit from the transfer.
3-3-109.19 Rev.
64
===================================================================
GENERAL AND CATEGORICAL
11-94 ELIGIBILITY
REQUIREMENTS 3258.10
(Cont.)
2. Blind
or Disabled as Defined Under SSI Program.--When it is alleged that an asset
was transferred to or for the benefit of an individual who is blind or totally
and permanently disabled, you must determine that the individual in fact meets
the definitions of blindness or disability used by the SSI program (which are
currently the same definitions as under the title II program) or under the
State plan programs established under title XVI or under the title II
program. If the individual is receiving
SSI benefits or is eligible for Medicaid as a result of blindness or
disability, you can accept the determination of blindness or disability as
valid evidence. However, if the
individual is not receiving SSI and/or Medicaid, you must make a separate
determination of blindness or disability.
When such a determination is necessary, follow the procedures usually
used in your State when an individual applies for Medicaid on the basis of
blindness or disability. However, if
you use more restrictive criteria under §1902(f) of the Act, you may not use a
more restrictive definition of blindness or disability. Instead, you must use the definitions used
by the SSI program.
C. In
addition to the above, a penalty for transferring an asset for less than fair
market value is not assessed if a satisfactory showing is made to the State
that:
o The individual intended to dispose of the
assets either at fair market value or for other valuable consideration;
o The assets were transferred exclusively
for a purpose other than to qualify for Medicaid;
o All
of the assets transferred for less than fair market value have been returned to
the individual; or
o Imposition of a penalty would work an
undue hardship.
Pending publication of regulations on
transfers of assets that will provide guidelines on what is meant by the
term "satisfactory showing,"
you must determine what constitutes a satisfactory showing in your State.
1. Intent
to Dispose of Assets for Fair Market Value or for Other Valuable Consideration.--See
§3258.1 for a definition of the term "valuable consideration." In determining whether an individual
intended to dispose of an asset for fair market value or for other valuable
consideration you should require that the individual establish, to your satisfaction,
the circumstances which caused him or her to transfer the asset for less than
fair market value. Verbal statements
alone generally are not sufficient.
Instead, require the individual to provide written evidence of attempts
to dispose of the asset for fair market value, as well as evidence to support
the value (if any) at which the asset was disposed.
2. Transfers
Exclusively for a Purpose Other Than to Qualify for Medicaid.--Require the
individual to establish, to your satisfaction, that the asset was transferred
for a purpose other than to qualify for Medicaid. Verbal assurances that the individual was not considering
Medicaid when the asset was disposed of are not sufficient. Rather, convincing evidence must be
presented as to the specific purpose for which the asset was transferred.
Rev. 64 3-3-109.20
===================================================================
GENERAL AND CATEGORICAL
3258.10
(Cont.) ELIGIBILITY
REQUIREMENTS 11-94
In some instances, the individual may
argue that the asset was not transferred to obtain Medicaid because the
individual is already eligible for Medicaid.
This may, in fact, be a valid argument.
However, the validity of the argument must be determined on a
case-by-case basis, based on the individual’s specific circumstances. For example, while the individual may now be
eligible for Medicaid, the asset in question (e.g., a home) might be counted as
a resource in the future, thus compromising the individual’s future
eligibility. In such a situation, the
argument that the individual was already eligible for Medicaid does not
suffice.
3. All
Assets Transferred for Less Than Fair Market Value Are Returned to the
Individual.--When all assets transferred are returned to the individual, no
penalty for transferring assets can be assessed. In this situation, you must ensure that any benefits due on
behalf of the individual are, in fact, paid.
When a penalty has been assessed and payment for services denied, a
return of the assets requires a retroactive adjustment, including erasure of
the penalty, back to the beginning of the penalty period.
However, such an adjustment does not
necessarily mean that benefits must be paid on behalf of the individual. Return of the assets in question to the
individual leaves the individual with assets which must be counted in
determining eligibility during the retroactive period. Counting those assets as available may
result in the individual being ineligible for Medicaid for some or all of the
retroactive period, (because of excess income/resources) as well as for a
period of time after the assets are returned.
It is important to note that, to void
imposition of a penalty, all of the assets in question or their fair
market equivalent must be returned. If,
for example, the asset was sold by the individual who received it, the full
market value of the asset must be returned to the transferor, either in cash or
another form acceptable to the State.
When only part of an asset or its
equivalent value is returned, a penalty period can be modified but not
eliminated. For example, if only half
the value of the asset is returned, the penalty period can be reduced by
one-half.
4. Imposition
of Penalty Would Work Undue Hardship.--When application of the transfer of
assets provisions discussed in these sections would work an undue hardship,
those provisions do not apply. Unlike
the policies applying to transfers made
on or before August 10, 1993, which only required that you acknowledge that the
statute included an undue hardship provision, under OBRA 1993 you must
implement an undue hardship procedure for transfers of assets. Further, that procedure must be described in
your Medicaid State Plan. You have
considerable flexibility in implementing an undue hardship provision. However, your undue hardship procedure must
meet the requirements discussed in subsection 5.
5. Undue
Hardship Defined.--Undue hardship exists when application of the transfer
of assets provisions would deprive the individual of medical care such that
his/her health or his/her life would be endangered. Undue hardship also exists when application of the transfer of
assets provisions would deprive the individual of food, clothing, shelter, or
other necessities of life.
3-3-109.21 Rev.
64
===================================================================
GENERAL AND CATEGORICAL
11-94 ELIGIBILITY
REQUIREMENTS 3258.11
Undue hardship does not exist when
application of the transfer of assets provisions merely causes the individual
inconvenience or when such application might restrict his or her lifestyle but
would not put him/her at risk of serious deprivation.
You have considerable flexibility in
deciding the circumstances under which you will not impose penalties under the
transfer of assets provisions because of undue hardship. For example, you can specify the criteria to
be used in determining whether the individual’s life or health would be
endangered and whether application of a penalty would deprive the individual of
food, clothing, or shelter. You can
also specify the extent to which an individual must make an effort to recover
assets transferred for less than fair market value. As a general rule, you have the flexibility to establish whatever
criteria you believe are appropriate, as long as you adhere to the basic
definition of undue hardship described above.
However, your undue hardship procedure
must, at a minimum, provide for and discuss the following administrative
requirements:
o Notice to recipients that an undue
hardship exception exists;
o A timely process for determining whether
an undue hardship waiver will be granted; and
o A process under which an adverse
determination can be appealed.
3258.11
Transfers of Assets and Spousal Impoverishment Provisions.--Under
§1917(c)(2)(B) of the Act, certain transfers of assets for less than fair
market value are exempt from penalty.
(See §3258.10 for a complete discussion of those exemptions.) Among those exemptions are transfers from an
individual to a spouse, transfers from an individual to a third party for the
sole benefit of a spouse, and transfers from a spouse to a third party for the
sole benefit of the spouse.
Section 1924 of the Act sets forth the
requirements for treatment of income and resources where there is an individual
in a medical institution with a spouse still living in the community. This section of the Act provides for
apportioning income and resources between the institutional spouse and the
community spouse so that the community spouse does not become impoverished
because the individual is in a medical institution. (See §3260 for a complete discussion of the spousal
impoverishment provisions.)
The exceptions to the transfer of assets
penalties regarding interspousal transfers and transfers to a third party for
the sole benefit of a spouse apply even under the spousal impoverishment
provisions. Thus, the institutional spouse can transfer unlimited assets to the
community spouse or to a third party for the sole benefit of the community
spouse.
When transfers between spouses are
involved, the unlimited transfer exception should have little effect on the
eligibility determination, primarily because resources belonging to both
spouses are combined in determining eligibility for the institutionalized
spouse. Thus, resources transferred to
a community spouse are still be considered available to the institutionalized
spouse for eligibility purposes.
Rev. 64 3-3-109.22
===================================================================
GENERAL AND CATEGORICAL
3258.11
(Cont.) ELIGIBILITY
REQUIREMENTS 11-94
The exception for transfers to a third
party for the sole benefit of the spouse may have greater impact on eligibility
because resources may potentially be placed beyond the reach of either spouse
and thus not be counted for eligibility purposes. However, for the exception to be applicable, the definition of
what is for the sole benefit of the spouse (see §3257) must be fully met. This definition is fairly restrictive, in
that it requires that any funds transferred be spent for the benefit of the
spouse within a time-frame actuarially commensurate with the spouse§s life
expectancy. If this requirement is not
met, the exemption is void, and a transfer to a third party may then be subject
to a transfer penalty.
3-3-109.23 Rev.
64
===================================================================
GENERAL AND CATEGORICAL
11-94 ELIGIBILITY
REQUIREMENTS 3259.1